Build AI Systems · 05

Governance & Safety

Evaluation, guardrails, and audit trails built in from day one — AI you can defend to regulators, customers, and your board.

The controls

Built in from day one, not bolted on.

Evaluation suites
Task, factuality, safety, and bias testing tied to your actual risk.
Guardrails & policy
Input / output controls and policy enforcement in code.
Audit trails
Reconstructable records of what ran, on what, and why.
Human-in-the-loop design
The right approval gates on the right decisions.
Bias & fairness review
Especially for lending, eligibility, and other consequential calls.
Compliance mapping
Controls aligned to HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2, and model-risk contexts.
Compliance

Standards we build to.

SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001HIPAAGDPRSSO / SAMLVPC deployAES-256Audit logs
The outcome
AI you can defend to a regulator or board
Incidents caught in eval, not in production
Deterministic rules where the model cannot be the final word
Lifecycle

Governance at every stage, not a final gate.

Responsibility cannot be bolted on at the end. We embed controls into each stage of the AI lifecycle — from the data that goes in to the monitoring that runs after launch — so trust is engineered, not inspected for later.

Data
bias & representativeness checks
privacy & consent
lineage & provenance
Development
reproducibility
secure SDLC
model cards
Evaluation
fairness & toxicity
accuracy & grounding
red-teaming
Deployment
approval gate
input/output guardrails
least-privilege access
Monitoring
drift & quality
immutable audit log
incident response
Architecture

The guardrail architecture.

Every request runs a gauntlet: input guardrails screen what goes into the model, output guardrails screen what comes back, high-risk actions divert to a human, and all of it is written to an immutable audit log.

User / app
Input guardrails
PII redaction · injection defense · policy
Model
Output guardrails
toxicity · PII · grounding · format
Response
Immutable audit log
every request & decision recorded
High risk → human review
approve · edit · block
Evaluation

Evidence-driven, and adversarially tested.

We turn fuzzy ideas like fairness and safety into measurable metrics, hold every release to them in CI, and actively try to break the system before attackers or edge cases do.

Define metrics
Build eval sets
Run in CI
gate release
Red-team
adversarial
Release gate
Monitor in prod
FairnessToxicityFactual accuracyGroundednessRobustnessPII leakage
Policy & audit

The controls that make AI defensible.

The record-keeping and risk machinery that lets you answer, at any moment, what a model is, what it did, and who signed off — and prove it to a regulator or your board.

Control

Model inventory & cards

A live registry of every model with its purpose, data, limits, and owner.

Control

Immutable audit trails

Tamper-evident logs of inputs, decisions, and actions for every request.

Control

Approval workflows

Sign-off gates for release and for high-risk actions, with a clear record.

Control

Risk tiering

Each use case classified by risk, with controls scaled to match.

Control

Access control

Role-based, least-privilege access to models, data, and tools.

Control

Incident register

A tracked record of issues, root causes, and the fixes that followed.

Mapped to the frameworks that apply
NIST AI RMFEU AI ActISO/IEC 42001ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIHIPAAGDPR
How we help

Trust, engineered end to end.

The services that make AI safe to scale — framework, guardrails, evaluation, and audit, delivered together or where you need them most.

AI governance framework

We design the policies, roles, and risk tiers that let AI scale with clear accountability and oversight.

PolicyRolesRisk tiers

Guardrails & safety engineering

We build the input and output guardrails — PII, injection, toxicity, grounding — that keep systems inside the lines.

Input/outputPIIInjection defense

Evaluation & red-teaming

We turn ethics into measurable metrics, build eval sets, and adversarially test models before and after release.

Eval setsMetricsAdversarial

Model risk & audit

We stand up model inventories, model cards, and audit trails so every system is inspectable and defensible.

InventoryModel cardsAudit

Responsible-AI & bias assessment

We assess fairness, explainability, and harm, and design the mitigations that address them.

FairnessExplainabilityMitigation

Compliance enablement

We map your controls to the frameworks that apply and ready you for audits and regulatory review.

MappingEvidenceAudit-ready
FAQ

Questions teams ask.

Can this be added to AI systems we've already built?
Yes. We frequently retrofit evaluation suites, guardrails, and audit logging onto existing systems and map the controls to your obligations — though it's cheaper and cleaner when designed in from the start.
Do you guarantee regulatory compliance?
We build to the standards and controls your regulators and legal team define, and produce the evidence and audit trails they require. Final sign-off always rests with your own risk and legal functions — we make their job provable, not optional.
What does an evaluation suite actually test?
It's tailored to your risk surface — typically task accuracy, factuality, safety, and bias, run continuously so failures surface in evaluation rather than in production.
Get started

Bring us a hypothesis. Leave with a system.

Tell us what's eating your team's time. We'll give you an honest read on whether AI is the right tool — and if it is, a scoped v1 with a timeline and cost.